Child Health for Infant Mortality Rates-myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theChild Health for Infant Mortality Rates. Answer: Introduction The right good health is a basic right that each and every individual has a right to, however children can be considered as the future of our society; hence the health status of the children must receive extra attention as a public health priority. Unfortunately, the health status of the children is the neglected alarmingly all over the world and this instrumental negligence has contributed alarmingly to the rapidly deteriorating health conditions of the children all over the world. It has to be understood that there have been a steady decrease in the health status of the children, and the statistics are even more alarming for Australia (Victora et al. 2012). Considering the statistical data from the past three to four years, the child mortality rates have decreased significantly from the past decade, however still, almost 70% of the total rate in the present can be contributed by the number of infant mortality rates. The total number of infant deaths in Australia had been 1012, and this ghastly status of current neonatal health status for Australia is one of the major public health concerns (Brinkman et al. 2012). However it has to be mentioned that the child death rate on an overall scale has decreased from 8.8% to 3.4% per 1000 live births, which is an appreciable effort over all. However it can not be denied that there is a significant room for more improvements and in order attain optimal health status for children a robust health improvement strategy will be required. This report will attempt to explore the health development goals and objectives for better child health status and evaluate the current status of child health in the h opes of gaining a better understanding of the escalating issue taking the example of Australia. Relevant MDGs and SDGs It has to be understood in this context that the child health status is nowhere near the requirement or primary outcome; there are many a restrictions or barriers which needs to be overcome in order to obtain the optimal health status for the children. Now there have been many a initiatives taken by both the global and national authorities to ensure improvements in the health of the public and progress in the health care industry as a whole (Wang and Lim 2012). One such global initiative or health improvements are the millennium developmental goals. Millennium developmental goals can be defined as the eight international developmental goals established by the United Nations, and out of those eight goals, number 4 and number 5 relate to the present health conditions of the children. Goal number four is to reduce the child mortality and goal number five is to improve maternal, and both the4se goals contribute directly or indirectly towards the health status of the children (Taylor et a l. 2015). Similar to MDGs, sustainable developmental goals are the set of global developmental goals developed by the United Nations as a follow up of the much broader millennium developmental goals. The list of sustainable developmental goals contains 17 separate goals that cater to the various developmental needs and requirements prevalent in the 193 member states of the United Nations. Among the different goals that has been set, goal three discusses the need for good health and wellbeing for all. For this goal to be met optimally for Australia, the nation is in dire need of emphasizing actions and initiatives for improving their child health status (Taylor et al. 2015). Key determinants There are various barriers to optimal child health all over the world, be it societal, environmental or economic, and the conditions in Australia is no exception to this phenomenon. According to the most of the authors, there is a distinct socio-cultural pattern of dominance on health and development and the socio-cultural factors, coupled with environmental restrictions are the key determinants of child health in Australia (Badland et al. 2014). Among the socio-cultural determinants, the advantages or discrepancies faced throughout their life contributes largely to the health status of different groups of children, and this gradient of societal privilege is mostly dependent upon the socio-economic status of the individual. The level of health literacy in the parental groups is also a key indicator of the health status of the children. According to a recent analysis of WHO, the parental and postnatal experience of the children contribute largely to the health status that they develop eventually. Lastly, the lifestyle or living conditions and nutritional status of the children also is a key indicator of the health condition they have all throughout their life (Riggs et al. 2012). National international literature According to the report of Fotso and Fogarty (2015), Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have been able to play a major role in focusing the Global attention of child development care in all parts of Australia. One of the major causes of the success is due to the fact that all the goals were set based upon the time bound scale. This was possible mainly due to the achievement alongside with sustainable development goals (SDGs). The child has been one of the major concerns in the goals of MDGs and SDGs. In case of Australia, the goal has been able to implemented depending upon the social and economic status of child health. Being one of the developments in the globe, it is easily possible to implement sustainable development in case related to personal development of the child and various aspect of the health. Requejo et al. (2015), have argued that one of the major challenges that have been faced in the method related to sustainable development of child health is to provide sustainable energy for the healthcare department. It is relevant to mention in this context that use of technology is one of the major aspects of child care health in Australia. The Millennium development goals have been able to deal with major severe child diseases that include genetic disorders. In terms of the Global, aspect the major achievement of MDGs and SDGs is in the context of eradication of a poverty that has helped to deal with one of the biggest challenge of child health care. According to the report of Requejo et al. (2015), one of the major achievement of MDGs is that the cases related to child mortality rate in Australia have been decreased to more than 50% in the last 10 years. It is also possible to collect in a funding from the government organization about improvement of child development care. This also relevant to mention that MDGs and SDGs have focused on maternal development care, which is believed to be one of the primary cause to have better health of newborn child. Arguments It is also possible to develop better monitoring system of the child health, which is responsible for improved level of Diagnosis. One of the major components of the millennium development is to track the condition of health in a child right after the moment of birth. The component of the goal has been successfully able to employ special child care experts in every Maternity work of Health Care Centre. This has made it possible for actively tracking the help of a child right after the delivery (Lay-Yee et al.2015). It is also possible to implement and develop civil society, which is needed from partnership with the World Health Organization and meeting up with the guidelines of child care development. One of the major important successes of the goal in MDGs and SDGs is related with the reduction of total number of patient in HIV or AIDS and malaria (Nigatu et al. 2014). This has been one of the major health issue encountered by young aged children in Australia. The implementation of the goals of Sustainable and Millennium development it is possible to significantly reduce the number of child patient suffering from deadly diseases. It is also possible to properly track the occurrence of AIDS among the pregnant women, which will reduce the chance of spreading of HIV to the children (Smith et al. 2014). All this goals is associated with sustainable development, that is believed to be one of the major effective way ensure that all health resources are being properly utilized in providing the best Health Care guideline for children (Glenton et al. 2013) Strategies In the recent years it has been reported that the levels of child neglect from the healthcare and abuse have increased in Australia. Protection of the children is everyones responsibility and for this protection Australian government has established a national framework for protecting the children for the year 2009-2010 (Currie and Reichman 2015). This framework is committed for the implementation of the actions which will help to protect the children and take care of their health. Australian government had also introduced some vaccines that are being approved by the therapeutic goods administration (TGA). This TGA used to monitor the safety of the medicines that are being used in Australia (Leyland et al. 2016). The country has various network or the health care communities which help in the development of the child. These organizations mainly aim for the improvement of the mental and physical health of the children for achieving the greater support for children who are facing the p hysical as well as the psychological problems. The government of state and territory are currently implementing the protection systems for the children. The national framework is used to deliver an integrated response without changing the responsibilities of the government. This framework also recognizes the existing efforts and the reform s that are being undertaken by the government of Australia for the protection of the children and supporting the families. The outcomes of this framework help to focus on the efforts of the framework and the actions provided by them under the rules of the government for reaching to the outcome of high level (Coyne, Hallstrm and Sderbck 2016). The Australian government offers some services for the vulnerable individuals also where the children can get help for mental health, misuse of the substances and reduction of the health risks. The National and international research shows that the families are having the strengths that will help in keeping the children safe, also to provide advice and support, to provide the proper services at the time of need so that the child can improve their personal behaviour and reduce the negative impacts (Makaroff et al. 2014). Conclusion Thus it can be conclude that the health status of the children must receive extra attention as a public health priority. There have been a steady decrease in the health status of the children, and the statistics are even more alarming for Australia. Millennium developmental goals can be defined as the eight international developmental goals established by the United Nations, and out of those eight goals, number 4 and number 5 relate to the present health conditions of the children. Similar to MDGs, sustainable developmental goals are the set of global developmental goals developed by the United Nations as a follow up of the much broader millennium developmental goals. The key determinants of the child health care are health and development and the socio-cultural factors, level of health literacy in the parental groups, the lifestyle or living conditions and nutritional status of the children also is a key indicator of the health. One of the major components of the millennium developm ent is to track the condition of health in a child right after the moment of birth. The country has various network or the health care communities which help in the development of the child. The outcomes of this framework help to focus on the efforts of the framework and the actions provided by them under the rules of the government for reaching to the outcome of high level. References: Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Aye, L., Butterworth, I., Hes, D. and Giles-Corti, B., 2014. Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health.Social science medicine,111, pp.64-73. Brinkman, S.A., Gialamas, A., Rahman, A., Mittinty, M.N., Gregory, T.A., Silburn, S., Goldfeld, S., Zubrick, S.R., Carr, V., Janus, M. and Hertzman, C., 2012. Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia. BMJ open, 2(5), p.e001075. Coyne, I., Hallstrm, I. and Sderbck, M., 2016. Reframing the focus from a family-centred to a child-centred care approach for childrens healthcare.Journal of Child Health Care,20(4), pp.494-502. Currie, J. and Reichman, N., 2015. Policies to promote child health: introducing the issue.The Future of Children,25(1), pp.3-9. Fotso, J.C. and Fogarty, L., 2015. Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 5: strengthening human resources for maternal, newborn and child health. BMC health services research, 15(1), p.S1. Glenton, C., Colvin, C.J., Carlsen, B., Swartz, A., Lewin, S., Noyes, J. and Rashidian, A., 2013. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,10(10). Lay-Yee, R., Milne, B., Davis, P., Pearson, J. and McLay, J., 2015. Determinants and disparities: a simulation approach to the case of child health care.Social Science Medicine,128, pp.202-211. Leyland, A.F., Pickett, K.E., Barber, S., McEachan, R. and Wright, J., 2016. Teacher-reported prevalence and management of child health problems at primary school.Journal of Child Health Care,20(2), pp.243-251. Makaroff, L.A., Xierali, I.M., Petterson, S.M., Shipman, S.A., Puffer, J.C. and Bazemore, A.W., 2014. Factors influencing family physicians contribution to the child health care workforce.The Annals of Family Medicine,12(5), pp.427-431. Nigatu, D., Gebremariam, A., Abera, M., Setegn, T. and Deribe, K., 2014. Factors associated with womens autonomy regarding maternal and child health care utilization in Bale Zone: a community based cross-sectional study.BMC women's health,14(1), p.79. Requejo, J.H., Bryce, J., Barros, A.J., Berman, P., Bhutta, Z., Chopra, M., Daelmans, B., De Francisco, A., Lawn, J., Maliqi, B. and Mason, E., 2015. Countdown to 2015 and beyond: fulfilling the health agenda for women and children. The Lancet, 385(9966), pp.466-476. Riggs, E., Davis, E., Gibbs, L., Block, K., Szwarc, J., Casey, S., Duell-Piening, P. and Waters, E., 2012. Accessing maternal and child health services in Melbourne, Australia: reflections from refugee families and service providers.BMC Health Services Research,12(1), p.117. Smith, A.C., Mutangiri, W., Fox, R. and Crofts, J.F., 2014. Millennium Development Goal 4: reducing perinatal and neonatal mortality in low?resource settings. The Obstetrician Gynaecologist, 16(1), pp.1-5. Taylor, S., Williams, B., Magnus, D., Goenka, A. and Modi, N., 2015. From MDG to SDG: good news for global child health?.Lancet (London, England),386(10000), p.1213. Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J., Axelson, H., Bhutta, Z.A., Chopra, M., Frana, G.V., Kerber, K., Kirkwood, B.R., Newby, H., Ronsmans, C. and Boerma, J.T., 2012. How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. The Lancet, 380(9848), pp.1149-1156. Wang, Y. and Lim, H., 2012. The global childhood obesity epidemic and the association between socio-economic status and childhood obesity.